


Gotta be a wind up Shirley?
by peterroyal76 » 21 Feb 2014 19:29
by From Despair To Where? » 21 Feb 2014 21:36
by Ian Royal » 21 Feb 2014 22:06
From Despair To Where? I can take or leave the big spending, that's just funny when it goes tits up, but to employ both Neil Warnock and Harry Redknapp is enough to make me hate any club.
by From Despair To Where? » 21 Feb 2014 22:49
by John Madejski's Wallet » 22 Feb 2014 00:18
by glass half full » 22 Feb 2014 08:58
John Madejski's Wallet Easy one, I'd take Warnock
Love to hate the guy, but have a bit of a soft spot for him as a manager too
by Silver Fox » 22 Feb 2014 09:02
From Despair To Where? That does beg the question: Your team are looking for a new manager, there are only 3 candidates - Warnock, Allardyce and Redknapp. Who would you rather have?
by soggy biscuit » 22 Feb 2014 09:31
From Despair To Where? That does beg the question: Your team are looking for a new manager, there are only 3 candidates - Warnock, Allardyce and Redknapp. Who would you rather have?
by SLAMMED » 22 Feb 2014 12:41
glass half fullJohn Madejski's Wallet Easy one, I'd take Warnock
Love to hate the guy, but have a bit of a soft spot for him as a manager too
Me too. It's the marsh at the bottom of our garden.
by Ian Herring » 23 Feb 2014 19:33
From Despair To Where? That does beg the question: Your team are looking for a new manager, there are only 3 candidates - Warnock, Allardyce and Redknapp. Who would you rather have?
by Victor Meldrew » 23 Feb 2014 19:48
Royal Rother Are you SERIOUSLY putting Reading's spending patterns in the same league as QPRs?
Anyway, essentially it's all to do with the Tredder factor.
by Ian Royal » 23 Feb 2014 20:43
John Madejski's Wallet Easy one, I'd take Warnock
Love to hate the guy, but have a bit of a soft spot for him as a manager too
by southbank1871 » 06 Mar 2014 13:55
by Wycombe Royal » 06 Mar 2014 14:11
southbank1871 QPR announce losses of £65.4m for the last financial year and could face a transfer embargo if they don't get promoted, as they will fall foul of the financial fair play rules.
by soggy biscuit » 06 Mar 2014 14:34
Delboy You can not just spend, spend ,spend, it does not work.
by Jackson Corner » 06 Mar 2014 15:43
Delboy Just posted losses of £65million and £177Milion in debt, that was to May last year, and things have got worse since! Are they going to be another Pompey,so glad we are better managed under SJM despite the Anton situation. You can not just spend, spend ,spend, it does not work.
by Jackson Corner » 06 Mar 2014 15:49
southbank1871 QPR announce losses of £65.4m for the last financial year and could face a transfer embargo if they don't get promoted, as they will fall foul of the financial fair play rules.
by From Despair To Where? » 06 Mar 2014 17:19
Victor MeldrewRoyal Rother Are you SERIOUSLY putting Reading's spending patterns in the same league as QPRs?
Anyway, essentially it's all to do with the Tredder factor.
Yes, of course I am serious-relatively speaking our spending was enormous.
Caskey cost us nearly £1 million not far off 20 years ago followed by Forster, Butler and Murty all costing big money in subsequent years-people choose to forget the fortunes that our club spent in the past when we were at the lower levels and that was without the Premier League fortunes and parachute payments that we and QPR have received in the past 2 seasons.
by Sanguine » 06 Mar 2014 17:23
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests