by Stuka » 02 Jun 2014 11:38
by melonhead » 02 Jun 2014 11:39
by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 02 Jun 2014 12:26
Stuka Really confused by Anton. So he didn't buy half the club after all? Why wouldn't he have paid his full share knowing we were about to be promot8ed and thus on the receiving end of a massive windfall? Since he didn't fully pay up, how much of the club does he actually own?
Somebody help me here!
by SPARTA » 02 Jun 2014 12:47
Who Moved The Goalposts?Stuka Really confused by Anton. So he didn't buy half the club after all? Why wouldn't he have paid his full share knowing we were about to be promot8ed and thus on the receiving end of a massive windfall? Since he didn't fully pay up, how much of the club does he actually own?
Somebody help me here!
I think Anton did buy the initial 51% from SJM for around 13m. He then failed to honour his agreement to buy the remaining 49%.
by Extended-Phenotype » 02 Jun 2014 12:54
melonhead a fully colour coded response does not indicate meh ness to me
by Tilehurstsouthbank » 02 Jun 2014 13:09
Extended-Phenotypemelonhead a fully colour coded response does not indicate meh ness to me
Admittedly copying and pasting what SJM wrote and changing the font colour took me quite a few seconds.
by genome » 02 Jun 2014 13:37
by Royal Biscuitman » 02 Jun 2014 14:06
Pepe the Horseman That's the Samuelson and Obelix problem solved then.
by Extended-Phenotype » 02 Jun 2014 14:21
TilehurstsouthbankExtended-Phenotypemelonhead a fully colour coded response does not indicate meh ness to me
Admittedly copying and pasting what SJM wrote and changing the font colour took me quite a few seconds.
Can you translate "lorem ipsum" to the less well informed of us?
by melonhead » 02 Jun 2014 14:39
Extended-Phenotypemelonhead a fully colour coded response does not indicate meh ness to me
Admittedly copying and pasting what SJM wrote and changing the font colour took me quite a few seconds.
by Extended-Phenotype » 02 Jun 2014 14:41
by melonhead » 02 Jun 2014 14:42
by Ian Royal » 02 Jun 2014 17:58
Royal BiscuitmanPepe the Horseman That's the Samuelson and Obelix problem solved then.
Off the board but are they off the books?
by AthleticoSpizz » 02 Jun 2014 18:53
If this wasn't a pre-requisite, then that would've been poor businessIan Royal has SJM reacquired the 51% he sold to TSI on some sort of penalty for failing to complete the deal.
by West Stand Flash » 02 Jun 2014 19:29
by tmesis » 02 Jun 2014 20:07
West Stand Flash Speculating when you know fck all is embarrassing.
by Lower West » 02 Jun 2014 23:15
Ian Royal The big question is: Is TSI now a silent shareholder. Or has SJM reacquired the 51% he sold to TSI on some sort of penalty for failing to complete the deal.
by Agent Balti » 03 Jun 2014 08:51
West Stand Flash I'd certainly listen to a bunch of Bus Drivers on HobNob over the club....
Just shut up and wait for news. Speculating when you know fck all is embarrassing.
by Royal Biscuitman » 03 Jun 2014 12:12
and good luck to him, hopefully he'll still attend games as a fan/honorary club president.Lower WestIan Royal The big question is: Is TSI now a silent shareholder. Or has SJM reacquired the 51% he sold to TSI on some sort of penalty for failing to complete the deal.
Silent but majority shareholder. Onus is on Sir John to find a new 100% lock, stock and barrel owner.
by floyd__streete » 03 Jun 2014 12:51
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google Adsense [Bot] and 338 guests