One8Seven1* wrote:Longy has always impressed me when I've watched him. Hopefully he'll do well at Cambridge and next summer push for a place in the first team.
LWJ wrote:One8Seven1* wrote:Longy has always impressed me when I've watched him. Hopefully he'll do well at Cambridge and next summer push for a place in the first team.![]()
Not good enough at Swindon, looked completely out his depth against a poor L1 outfit.
L2/L1 the highest level for him.
and old players, and all ages in between. Until they've gone and are doing well, and we knock the club for letting them go/selling them. Etc . It's what happens in here.mambo3 wrote: you guys are quick to knock young players.
+1mambo3 wrote: give the boy a chance a handful of games is not enough, hope half a season does the trick, good luck to him
Not seen huge amounts of him, but neither he nor Griffin ever gave me much reason to think they'd really play above League One or Two much.As you say though, plenty of players just need regular games in a lower league to be able to make a step up in the mid to late 20s though.Nameless wrote:Tend to agree with Slater. Long is very much in the Sweeney bracket. Steady performer, never lacks effort but nothing about him that suggests he's a Championship or higher player.
These players may be late developers and in a couple of years come back and rise up the divisions again. It doesn't happen often though....
Nameless and SCIAG are very positive about lots of the young players they've seen... me too, though I wouldn't claim to be as knowledgeable as them. They hardly criticise everyone regardless.muirinho wrote:and old players, and all ages in between. Until they've gone and are doing well, and we knock the club for letting them go/selling them. Etc . It's what happens in here.mambo3 wrote: you guys are quick to knock young players.
+1mambo3 wrote: give the boy a chance a handful of games is not enough, hope half a season does the trick, good luck to him
I very rarely criticise players and am probably one of the most positive on here.muirinho wrote:and old players, and all ages in between. Until they've gone and are doing well, and we knock the club for letting them go/selling them. Etc . It's what happens in here.mambo3 wrote: you guys are quick to knock young players.
+1mambo3 wrote: give the boy a chance a handful of games is not enough, hope half a season does the trick, good luck to him
Yeah fair enough, it was more of a general comment about how negative this board can be. Having said that - why did the club keep him on? Just to make sure they get some money when he goes to a L2 club? Or do they think he still has some potential.LWJ wrote:I very rarely criticise players and am probably one of the most positive on here.muirinho wrote:and old players, and all ages in between. Until they've gone and are doing well, and we knock the club for letting them go/selling them. Etc . It's what happens in here.mambo3 wrote: you guys are quick to knock young players.
+1mambo3 wrote: give the boy a chance a handful of games is not enough, hope half a season does the trick, good luck to him
Long is not good enough, there is no point flogging a dead horse. He is 21, you can't call him young anymore. He should be progressed a lot further than he is.
Does that go for Tanner, Stacy, Keown, Kuhl?LWJ wrote:I very rarely criticise players and am probably one of the most positive on here.muirinho wrote:and old players, and all ages in between. Until they've gone and are doing well, and we knock the club for letting them go/selling them. Etc . It's what happens in here.mambo3 wrote: you guys are quick to knock young players.
+1mambo3 wrote: give the boy a chance a handful of games is not enough, hope half a season does the trick, good luck to him
Long is not good enough, there is no point flogging a dead horse. He is 21, you can't call him young anymore. He should be progressed a lot further than he is.
I would argue that all but Keown have progressed a lot further than him.. Having already spent time out on loan and been in and around the first team a lot more.mambo3 wrote:Does that go for Tanner, Stacy, Keown, Kuhl?LWJ wrote:I very rarely criticise players and am probably one of the most positive on here.muirinho wrote:
and old players, and all ages in between. Until they've gone and are doing well, and we knock the club for letting them go/selling them. Etc . It's what happens in here.
+1
Long is not good enough, there is no point flogging a dead horse. He is 21, you can't call him young anymore. He should be progressed a lot further than he is.
This is his last year.wingnut wrote:Obviously still not able to shift out Paulo permanently. How long's his contract left to run?
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Honest Guv, Royals and Racers and 35 guests