Not sure anyone claims to be ITK but you certainly get a feel after a while for those who pick up on stuff early and those just reposting stuff they have seen talked about by kids on Twitterblythspartan wrote:I assume that I should just ignore anyone claiming to be ITK on here, as most of it stems from media speculation.Royal Bison wrote:So when we said Oliveira was "100% a done deal"
LOL
Snowball wrote:sandman wrote:Yeah brilliant news.Snowball wrote:I for one am glad he's not coming back
I think N-O is a bad apple. We have Baldock, Meite, Nokavich, Loader, and there are other forwards out there.
No promises, bob. But maybe Loader won't have to worry about Champ. Was rumored to go to Prem for 10mil?Rollerbob wrote:How many did Loader score last season? Is there any promise he'll actually be better and more suited to the Champ?
VERY unwanted at Norwich and strikes me as more than average-selfish for a striker.Pepe the Horseman wrote:Such a bad apple he did everything he possibly could to recover from a hamstring injury in record time, to get back playing in a relegation battle for a club he was only on loan at, when he should've been out for the season.Snowball wrote:sandman wrote:
Yeah brilliant news.
We've lost one of our strikers to a potential relegation rival and now the guy we wanted to replace him with looks to be going somewhere else, leaving us to scramble for a replacement who likely won't be as good as Oliveira or Bod.
I think N-O is a bad apple. We have Baldock, Meite, Nokavich, Loader, and there are other forwards out there.
Agree with this.Rollerbob wrote:Snowball wrote:sandman wrote:
Yeah brilliant news.
I think N-O is a bad apple. We have Baldock, Meite, Nokavich, Loader, and there are other forwards out there.![]()
Yeah! We don't need Portugese internationals! The players we have already are better! He's a bad apple.. the amount of problems he caused last season was awful!
Utter nonsense. The guy is endlessly better than what we already have up front, and likely much better than what we can afford to bring in. Remember when we didn't have him? We weren't very good.
Only Reading fans would rather inexperience, youth and players that management deemed "not good enough" last season.
Of course you'd take Olivera back. Don't be a silly billy liar pants.
Other points:
Have you ever seen Novakovich play?
How many did Loader score last season? Is there any promise he'll actually be better and more suited to the champ?
That's a player we don't want who did badly up front on his own, our first choice right winger for whom we have uncertain cover, a promising but untested young player and a player with 1 senior goal who has mostly played behind a striker and looks lost leading the line.Snowball wrote:sandman wrote:Yeah brilliant news.Snowball wrote:I for one am glad he's not coming back
We've lost one of our strikers to a potential relegation rival and now the guy we wanted to replace him with looks to be going somewhere else, leaving us to scramble for a replacement who likely won't be as good as Oliveira or Bod.
I think N-O is a bad apple. We have Baldock, Meite, Nokavich, Loader, and there are other forwards out there.
Fully agreescumbag wrote:it's laughable that anyone says we don't need Oliviera, he transformed our season.
Hooper has a far superior record at this level as a goal scorer. plays more games and scores far more goals.scumbag wrote:it's laughable that anyone says we don't need Oliviera, he transformed our season.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests