The generic transfer thread

11034 posts
User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 22360
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: The generic transfer thread

by Royal Rother » 07 Aug 2023 14:18

South Coast Royal
NathStPaul
South Coast Royal
Fancy a small wager of £200 or so?

I don't gamble with money anymore, kicked the habit.

I will wager a tin of biscuits of your choice/my choice though.


Not worth it for me so will put my money where my mouth is with the bookies although unfortunately they will give me worse odds than even money as they have more faith in the Super Reds than you do. :wink:


It'll be interesting to see what happens that's for sure.

Arsenal have strengthened very well I think - except up front. False No 9s are all well and good when the need arises, but every top team needs a classy / lethal finisher to become the finished article. Haevertz, Jesus and Nketiah are not not lethal finishers.

Liverpool seem to have decent riches up front, but, not sure about the midfield (yet).

As for Utd, well, can't say I'm altogether impressed by what they have added. Hojlund is no Haaland - Onana will create stuff that De Gea couldn't, but every PL team will / should be practising shots from the half-way line as I think he comes a bit too far out and will give plenty of opportunities for the 50+ yard strike.

Chelsea will be a lot better under Poch, could be a surprise package, but have a huge amount of ground to make up during what is effectively a season of transition.

Spurs are Spurs.

Surprisingly Newcastle haven't strengthened enough from what I have seen and could struggle to maintain last season's momentum.

Hardly rocket science but for me:

1 City
2 Arsenal
3 Utd
4 Chelsea
5 Liverpool
6 Newcastle
7 Spurs

User avatar
LUX
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 14025
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:38
Location: Archie Gemmill!!!

Re: The generic transfer thread

by LUX » 07 Aug 2023 14:26

how will BHA get on? Think they were sixth last season. They have lost some of their stars.

User avatar
NathStPaul
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11747
Joined: 19 Feb 2019 14:21

Re: The generic transfer thread

by NathStPaul » 07 Aug 2023 14:28

They always seem to just seem to replace their stars who leave, seem to find a cheaper replacement who will do the same job. Great recruitment at Brighton.

Looking forward to seeing how Evan Ferguson does this season. Has all the potential in the world.

User avatar
Hendo
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22884
Joined: 25 Mar 2012 20:53
Location: Lambs to the cosmic slaughter

Re: The generic transfer thread

by Hendo » 07 Aug 2023 14:31

NathStPaul They always seem to just seem to replace their stars who leave, seem to find a cheaper replacement who will do the same job. Great recruitment at Brighton.

Looking forward to seeing how Evan Ferguson does this season. Has all the potential in the world.


Think they'll comfortably in the top half.

Yes, keen to see how Ferguson does - got him in my FF team this year.

Sanguine
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 27906
Joined: 27 Feb 2013 14:36

Re: The generic transfer thread

by Sanguine » 07 Aug 2023 14:43

Spurs reject Bayern's 'final' offer for Harry Kane, so it looks like Levy is happy for him to leave for free next season.


User avatar
genome
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26487
Joined: 08 Jul 2012 13:29
Location: Universe

Re: The generic transfer thread

by genome » 07 Aug 2023 14:58

It's a tricky decision. Cash in now, or get a guaranteed 25-30 goals next season (especially in a more attacking Spurs side). Might be being naive but I can't see him going to Chelsea or Arsenal on a free and tarnishing his reputation like that.

User avatar
genome
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26487
Joined: 08 Jul 2012 13:29
Location: Universe

Re: The generic transfer thread

by genome » 07 Aug 2023 14:59

Or, the other scenario which noone seems to have considered, Spurs make progress under Postecoglou and he signs a new contract.

User avatar
NathStPaul
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11747
Joined: 19 Feb 2019 14:21

Re: The generic transfer thread

by NathStPaul » 07 Aug 2023 15:03

It is a wise move from Levy, they need Kane this season and it is far too late in the day to replace him with anyone adequate.

Sanguine
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 27906
Joined: 27 Feb 2013 14:36

Re: The generic transfer thread

by Sanguine » 07 Aug 2023 15:34

genome It's a tricky decision. Cash in now, or get a guaranteed 25-30 goals next season (especially in a more attacking Spurs side). Might be being naive but I can't see him going to Chelsea or Arsenal on a free and tarnishing his reputation like that.


He'd go abroad on a free, shirley.

I'd love to see Spurs crash the title party, but I really can't see it. All respect to Kane if he does eventually commit essentially the rest of his useful career to Spurs.


User avatar
Hendo
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22884
Joined: 25 Mar 2012 20:53
Location: Lambs to the cosmic slaughter

Re: The generic transfer thread

by Hendo » 07 Aug 2023 15:44

Sanguine
genome It's a tricky decision. Cash in now, or get a guaranteed 25-30 goals next season (especially in a more attacking Spurs side). Might be being naive but I can't see him going to Chelsea or Arsenal on a free and tarnishing his reputation like that.


He'd go abroad on a free, shirley.

I'd love to see Spurs crash the title party, but I really can't see it. All respect to Kane if he does eventually commit essentially the rest of his useful career to Spurs.


Think it'll be abroad or Utd. Probably less likely Utd now seeing as they've splashed the cash on a new forward.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7235
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: The generic transfer thread

by WestYorksRoyal » 07 Aug 2023 16:43

genome Or, the other scenario which noone seems to have considered, Spurs make progress under Postecoglou and he signs a new contract.

Finishing 4th would be progress, but surely not enough? They would still be miles off City and consistently challenging for silverware, which is what he needs. Under Pocchetino he was young enough to buy into a long term project. Not any more.

User avatar
genome
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26487
Joined: 08 Jul 2012 13:29
Location: Universe

Re: The generic transfer thread

by genome » 07 Aug 2023 17:55

WestYorksRoyal
genome Or, the other scenario which noone seems to have considered, Spurs make progress under Postecoglou and he signs a new contract.

Finishing 4th would be progress, but surely not enough? They would still be miles off City and consistently challenging for silverware, which is what he needs. Under Pocchetino he was young enough to buy into a long term project. Not any more.


Considering there's no European football, there's no excuse for them to not have a good run at the cups. A cup and European football qualification while playing a good brand of football might be enough to convince him, he does love the club.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7235
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: The generic transfer thread

by WestYorksRoyal » 07 Aug 2023 18:10

genome
WestYorksRoyal
genome Or, the other scenario which noone seems to have considered, Spurs make progress under Postecoglou and he signs a new contract.

Finishing 4th would be progress, but surely not enough? They would still be miles off City and consistently challenging for silverware, which is what he needs. Under Pocchetino he was young enough to buy into a long term project. Not any more.


Considering there's no European football, there's no excuse for them to not have a good run at the cups. A cup and European football qualification while playing a good brand of football might be enough to convince him, he does love the club.

I guess the love of his club will have an impact. But I'd say a cup final and a top 4 finish isn't enough for a player of his standard. FA Cup win perhaps, but even then leagues and continental trophies are in play if he moves and not if he stays.


WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7235
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: The generic transfer thread

by WestYorksRoyal » 07 Aug 2023 19:06

Southampton rejecting almost £50m for Lavia, to go with their rejection of £30m+ for JWP. Makes a mockery of this argument about how essential the enormous parachute payments are. See also Gnoto and James staying at Leeds all while having money in the bank to sign Ampadu.

Sell your players to manage. See Leicester with Maddison and Barnes.

User avatar
Franchise FC
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11707
Joined: 22 May 2007 16:24
Location: Relocated to LA

Re: The generic transfer thread

by Franchise FC » 08 Aug 2023 09:50

WestYorksRoyal Southampton rejecting almost £50m for Lavia, to go with their rejection of £30m+ for JWP. Makes a mockery of this argument about how essential the enormous parachute payments are. See also Gnoto and James staying at Leeds all while having money in the bank to sign Ampadu.

Sell your players to manage. See Leicester with Maddison and Barnes.

Why does it make a mockery of anything ?
Maybe, in Southampton’s case they’ve not overspent in the PL and can afford to keep some players.
Turning down £80m is not the same as spending that £80m
It might be that, on the contracts those players have, it would only cost them a few million to keep them this season and that could conceivably be covered by the parachute payments

Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 20824
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: The generic transfer thread

by Stranded » 08 Aug 2023 10:02

Franchise FC
WestYorksRoyal Southampton rejecting almost £50m for Lavia, to go with their rejection of £30m+ for JWP. Makes a mockery of this argument about how essential the enormous parachute payments are. See also Gnoto and James staying at Leeds all while having money in the bank to sign Ampadu.

Sell your players to manage. See Leicester with Maddison and Barnes.

Why does it make a mockery of anything ?
Maybe, in Southampton’s case they’ve not overspent in the PL and can afford to keep some players.
Turning down £80m is not the same as spending that £80m
It might be that, on the contracts those players have, it would only cost them a few million to keep them this season and that could conceivably be covered by the parachute payments


Its not a mockery but it highlights the absurdity of them - a team gets relegated, is given X million more than a side who has been in the Champ for a few years - meaning they can afford to absorb larger contracts of individuals who are too good for the division - the fact that 1 club can afford to turn down 80m, probably in part because the parachute means they can afford to keep the players adds to the disparity that can be seen at the top end of the Champ at times.

User avatar
LUX
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 14025
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:38
Location: Archie Gemmill!!!

Re: The generic transfer thread

by LUX » 08 Aug 2023 10:09

surely the player will want to go and this might affect his performances. He'd be getting far more money and great exposure in the Premiership (assuming he gets selected I guess).

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7235
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: The generic transfer thread

by WestYorksRoyal » 08 Aug 2023 10:15

Franchise FC
WestYorksRoyal Southampton rejecting almost £50m for Lavia, to go with their rejection of £30m+ for JWP. Makes a mockery of this argument about how essential the enormous parachute payments are. See also Gnoto and James staying at Leeds all while having money in the bank to sign Ampadu.

Sell your players to manage. See Leicester with Maddison and Barnes.

Why does it make a mockery of anything ?
Maybe, in Southampton’s case they’ve not overspent in the PL and can afford to keep some players.
Turning down £80m is not the same as spending that £80m
It might be that, on the contracts those players have, it would only cost them a few million to keep them this season and that could conceivably be covered by the parachute payments

Clubs should be sensible anyhow. Those with responsible finances should need to sell 1 or 2 to manage the transition, and those who are reckless should be facing a firesale.

But as it is, they are promised at least £40m a season which effectively subsidises PL players in the Championship

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 23075
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Over the hills and far away

Re: The generic transfer thread

by Sutekh » 08 Aug 2023 10:21

WestYorksRoyal
Franchise FC
WestYorksRoyal Southampton rejecting almost £50m for Lavia, to go with their rejection of £30m+ for JWP. Makes a mockery of this argument about how essential the enormous parachute payments are. See also Gnoto and James staying at Leeds all while having money in the bank to sign Ampadu.

Sell your players to manage. See Leicester with Maddison and Barnes.

Why does it make a mockery of anything ?
Maybe, in Southampton’s case they’ve not overspent in the PL and can afford to keep some players.
Turning down £80m is not the same as spending that £80m
It might be that, on the contracts those players have, it would only cost them a few million to keep them this season and that could conceivably be covered by the parachute payments

Clubs should be sensible anyhow. Those with responsible finances should need to sell 1 or 2 to manage the transition, and those who are reckless should be facing a firesale.

But as it is, they are promised at least £40m a season which effectively subsidises PL players in the Championship


Clubs being sensible :? good luck with that one.

User avatar
Winston Biscuit
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 39232
Joined: 05 May 2017 07:32
Location: Go-To-Market HNA Team Lead

Re: The generic transfer thread

by Winston Biscuit » 08 Aug 2023 10:56

Livramento goes to Newcastle for £40M

11034 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fluff and 55 guests

It is currently 17 Aug 2025 15:11