Looking forward to the reportCypry wrote:I've just decided I'm IN for this
winchester_royal wrote:Looking forward to the reportCypry wrote:I've just decided I'm IN for this
I've got a logon for the Conf Centre wifi, thought I'd stream it live this eveningBarry the bird boggler wrote:winchester_royal wrote:Looking forward to the reportCypry wrote:I've just decided I'm IN for this
I know Dirk, it was a little joke about the events of last year...Alexander Litvinenko wrote:Not sure why people expect a report .. well, yes I do - it's got a lot to do with STAR's on-going failure to communicate the terms of reference properly.
But these forums are held under "Chatham House" rules (nearly but not quite, for the pedants!) - and the speakers come along on the condition that proceedings aren't reported and there are no press there, so they speak more freely.
As soon as reports are issued, the whole point of these forums is gone, because people won't come along and speak freely any more - so this is all lost and things will turn into just another worthless talking shop, stage-managed by the club's PR department.
8winchester_royal wrote:Give Nige's performance tonight a mark out of 10
Possibly edged a 9 for me - feel a bit more confident after that....parky wrote:8winchester_royal wrote:Give Nige's performance tonight a mark out of 10
But surely some reps from the club are in attendance and Adkins or whoever doesn't speak more freely really? He must be told in advance by the club what he can and can't say? Or at the very least, knowing there are club representatives there, he's not going to say 100% what he might like to say. Not saying he has any gripes at this stage in his RFC career, but you know what I mean, shirley?Alexander Litvinenko wrote:Not sure why people expect a report .. well, yes I do - it's got a lot to do with STAR's on-going failure to communicate the terms of reference properly.
But these forums are held under "Chatham House" rules (nearly but not quite, for the pedants!) - and the speakers come along on the condition that proceedings aren't reported and there are no press there, so they speak more freely.
As soon as reports are issued, the whole point of these forums is gone, because people won't come along and speak freely any more - so this is all lost and things will turn into just another worthless talking shop, stage-managed by the club's PR department.
That's not the way it worked in the past. Steve Coppell, for instance, was incredibly open at Fans' Forums. I remember once a forum when he waited 'til SJM had left, took his jacket off sat back and said "Right, now we can talk...."Royal Lady wrote:But surely some reps from the club are in attendance and Adkins or whoever doesn't speak more freely really? He must be told in advance by the club what he can and can't say? Or at the very least, knowing there are club representatives there, he's not going to say 100% what he might like to say. Not saying he has any gripes at this stage in his RFC career, but you know what I mean, shirley?Alexander Litvinenko wrote:Not sure why people expect a report .. well, yes I do - it's got a lot to do with STAR's on-going failure to communicate the terms of reference properly.
But these forums are held under "Chatham House" rules (nearly but not quite, for the pedants!) - and the speakers come along on the condition that proceedings aren't reported and there are no press there, so they speak more freely.
As soon as reports are issued, the whole point of these forums is gone, because people won't come along and speak freely any more - so this is all lost and things will turn into just another worthless talking shop, stage-managed by the club's PR department.
I've read twitter reports of him being very open and anyone who thinks we're not trying to sign someone is very wrong, or words to that effect. But talk is cheap and it's actions I'm more interested in - we'll see at end of transfer window whether we've made the right choices/purchases I suppose....
I think players' forums are different (they hardly ever say anything interesting or debatable!), but certainly managers' forums have been published - but later, when the info isn't as "live" and with anything particularly secretive or contentious removed.PieEater wrote:These rules seem to have changed a few years ago as there were pretty detailed reports from these forums before that, albeit after someone got around to tying up the Q&As.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests