WE’ve got a string of young keepers, Rafael is not irreplaceable.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Apart from rafael , anyone can leave if they. Want.
Would be too worried about anyone in particular
I. Think 50p for aluko is too much
I would like t keep rafaelNameless wrote:WE’ve got a string of young keepers, Rafael is not irreplaceable.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Apart from rafael , anyone can leave if they. Want.
Would be too worried about anyone in particular
I. Think 50p for aluko is too much
So would I, but he’s more replaceable than Meite, Richards, Yiadom, Rino or Morrison as things stand.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:I would like t keep rafaelNameless wrote:WE’ve got a string of young keepers, Rafael is not irreplaceable.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Apart from rafael , anyone can leave if they. Want.
Would be too worried about anyone in particular
I. Think 50p for aluko is too much
As mentioned above, a £5m package for three years for him, however they want to break that down - wages/signing on fee. It isn’t bad valuewindermereROYAL wrote:We could let Moore go on a free but nobody will give him the wages we are paying him.
He has a plan for leftback though.Torbay Royal wrote: The next couple of years could be very tough but recruitment from lower down could be vital so I hope MB has a good contact book.
The Secret Footballer, in one of his books said the following, which I was surprised about.Snowflake Royal wrote:So Aluko will cost us something like £750k to £1.5m over the next year.
I'd say that puts his price at around -£500k.
Ie, if it got him off the wage bill, I'd pay a club £500k to sign him and we'd still come out ahead on the deal.
Club’s can’t transfer a player unless the player agrees. Player has a contract for x years and y money so are entitled to set conditions on a move. It’s no inferential to any other job that is contract based - you want to end my contract early ? Pay me what you owe me !Forbury Lion wrote:The Secret Footballer, in one of his books said the following, which I was surprised about.Snowflake Royal wrote:So Aluko will cost us something like £750k to £1.5m over the next year.
I'd say that puts his price at around -£500k.
Ie, if it got him off the wage bill, I'd pay a club £500k to sign him and we'd still come out ahead on the deal.
If a player leaves and hasn't instigated the move theirselves i.e. asked for a transfer, then the selling club has to pay up the players contract in full. Now, I imagine there would be room for negotiation in this if it is in the players interests to move e.g. new club gives him more money/signing on fee/longer contract/more chance of playing, but if the player digs his heels in that means the club will take a hit to the finances if the transfer fee is below the cost of paying up the players contract.... maybe we'll end up paying him off over a number of years? (There was a story about Robbie Fowler still being Leeds Utds top earner years after he left).
As a player, getting your old contract paid off is great but you can then ask for a signing on bonus and a new longer contract, so it's a win all round, unless the club signing you is based in an undesirable location.
Nameless wrote:Club’s can’t transfer a player unless the player agrees. Player has a contract for x years and y money so are entitled to set conditions on a move. It’s no different to any other job that is contract based - you want to end my contract early ? Pay me what you owe me ! It’s only the flip side of players not being able to just walk out on a contract if they fancy moving clubsForbury Lion wrote:The Secret Footballer, in one of his books said the following, which I was surprised about.Snowflake Royal wrote:So Aluko will cost us something like £750k to £1.5m over the next year.
I'd say that puts his price at around -£500k.
Ie, if it got him off the wage bill, I'd pay a club £500k to sign him and we'd still come out ahead on the deal.
If a player leaves and hasn't instigated the move theirselves i.e. asked for a transfer, then the selling club has to pay up the players contract in full. Now, I imagine there would be room for negotiation in this if it is in the players interests to move e.g. new club gives him more money/signing on fee/longer contract/more chance of playing, but if the player digs his heels in that means the club will take a hit to the finances if the transfer fee is below the cost of paying up the players contract.... maybe we'll end up paying him off over a number of years? (There was a story about Robbie Fowler still being Leeds Utds top earner years after he left).
As a player, getting your old contract paid off is great but you can then ask for a signing on bonus and a new longer contract, so it's a win all round, unless the club signing you is based in an undesirable location.
I like Meite, but he wouldn't have got near the 106 team.Crowbar6753 wrote:5 Million for McIntyre (First season, but i admit a great prospect) and only 3 Million for Meite (17 Goal striker/Winger). I'm pretty sure goal scorers with a good goal to game ratio tend to be worth more than defenders, however, it sometimes makes me wonder how Meite got 17 goals in this team when we are generally so poor at creating chances for our strikers.
Is Meite really a good striker? would he have scored lets say 25 goals if he was in our 106 point record breaking team, with the amazing fast counter attacking wing playing system?
Good QCrowbar6753 wrote:
Is Meite really a good striker? would he have scored lets say 25 goals if he was in our 106 point record breaking team, with the amazing fast counter attacking wing playing system?
That is exactly why very few players put in formal transfer requests.Forbury Lion wrote:The Secret Footballer, in one of his books said the following, which I was surprised about.Snowflake Royal wrote:So Aluko will cost us something like £750k to £1.5m over the next year.
I'd say that puts his price at around -£500k.
Ie, if it got him off the wage bill, I'd pay a club £500k to sign him and we'd still come out ahead on the deal.
If a player leaves and hasn't instigated the move theirselves i.e. asked for a transfer, then the selling club has to pay up the players contract in full. Now, I imagine there would be room for negotiation in this if it is in the players interests to move e.g. new club gives him more money/signing on fee/longer contract/more chance of playing, but if the player digs his heels in that means the club will take a hit to the finances if the transfer fee is below the cost of paying up the players contract.... maybe we'll end up paying him off over a number of years? (There was a story about Robbie Fowler still being Leeds Utds top earner years after he left).
As a player, getting your old contract paid off is great but you can then ask for a signing on bonus and a new longer contract, so it's a win all round, unless the club signing you is based in an undesirable location.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 252 guests