by South Coast Royal » 25 Jan 2026 10:21
by Sutekh » 25 Jan 2026 10:30
You forgot “Virgil was unlucky” & the always popular “it was windy”South Coast Royal wrote:67% possession, 11 corners to 3 and same number of shots should yield at least a draw.
The only excuse last night was that they had an away trip in the South of France on Wednesday night whereas Bournemouth had a trip along the coast 2 nights before.
That led to Slot protecting Ekitike by having him on the bench.
Unfortunately he also did the same with his best left-back and Kerkez was once again out of position and rinsed for Bournemouth's 2nd goal-it has happened too often this season.
So, just the Champs League, the FA Cup and 4th or 5th spot to play for but to succeed in any of those Liverpool will need to create more realistic scoring chances and not always look for the perfect goal.
BTW Salah, often criticised for being greedy was the opposite last night and , faced with a clear chance on goal, decided to try and square the ball to Gakpo.
by South Coast Royal » 25 Jan 2026 10:46
I can verify that it was indeed very windy and I believe that VVD thought the ball was going out of play.Sutekh wrote:You forgot “Virgil was unlucky” & the always popular “it was windy”South Coast Royal wrote:67% possession, 11 corners to 3 and same number of shots should yield at least a draw.
The only excuse last night was that they had an away trip in the South of France on Wednesday night whereas Bournemouth had a trip along the coast 2 nights before.
That led to Slot protecting Ekitike by having him on the bench.
Unfortunately he also did the same with his best left-back and Kerkez was once again out of position and rinsed for Bournemouth's 2nd goal-it has happened too often this season.
So, just the Champs League, the FA Cup and 4th or 5th spot to play for but to succeed in any of those Liverpool will need to create more realistic scoring chances and not always look for the perfect goal.
BTW Salah, often criticised for being greedy was the opposite last night and , faced with a clear chance on goal, decided to try and square the ball to Gakpo.
#slotlostplot
by Sutekh » 25 Jan 2026 10:56
Virgil obviously never taught “ Veiligheid eerst en zet het in rij z“South Coast Royal wrote:I can verify that it was indeed very windy and I believe that VVD thought the ball was going out of play.Sutekh wrote:You forgot “Virgil was unlucky” & the always popular “it was windy”South Coast Royal wrote:67% possession, 11 corners to 3 and same number of shots should yield at least a draw.
The only excuse last night was that they had an away trip in the South of France on Wednesday night whereas Bournemouth had a trip along the coast 2 nights before.
That led to Slot protecting Ekitike by having him on the bench.
Unfortunately he also did the same with his best left-back and Kerkez was once again out of position and rinsed for Bournemouth's 2nd goal-it has happened too often this season.
So, just the Champs League, the FA Cup and 4th or 5th spot to play for but to succeed in any of those Liverpool will need to create more realistic scoring chances and not always look for the perfect goal.
BTW Salah, often criticised for being greedy was the opposite last night and , faced with a clear chance on goal, decided to try and square the ball to Gakpo.
#slotlostplot
I am not giving Virgil a free pass but he really does need more aware and stronger players along side him in the back 4.
by South Coast Royal » 25 Jan 2026 10:59
The trouble is that at that end of their ground it is so small that there probably isn't a row Z.Sutekh wrote:Virgil obviously never taught “ Veiligheid eerst en zet het in rij z“South Coast Royal wrote:I can verify that it was indeed very windy and I believe that VVD thought the ball was going out of play.Sutekh wrote:
You forgot “Virgil was unlucky” & the always popular “it was windy”
#slotlostplot
I am not giving Virgil a free pass but he really does need more aware and stronger players along side him in the back 4.
by Sutekh » 25 Jan 2026 18:44
And still no sign of either a central defender or a manager with a plot.BRO_BOT wrote:Plummeting down the table to 6th!
by Sanguine » 29 Jan 2026 10:24
by Sutekh » 29 Jan 2026 11:01
Code: Select all
Another defender gone and still no incoming likely. They have given up haven’t they.Sanguine wrote:Jeremie Frimpong missed 12 games to injury in six seasons at Celtic and Leverkusen. He's now on his third hamstring injury since arriving at Liverpool
by Sanguine » 29 Jan 2026 13:44
Some broad sympathy with not spending - I've been critical of the likes of City dumping £50m on a player every time they get an injury. Five defenders out is a nightmare. They can't reasonably have another PL Top-4 player at their disposal.Sutekh wrote:Code: Select all
Another defender gone and still no incoming likely. They have given up haven’t they.Sanguine wrote:Jeremie Frimpong missed 12 games to injury in six seasons at Celtic and Leverkusen. He's now on his third hamstring injury since arriving at Liverpool
by South Coast Royal » 29 Jan 2026 14:02
by South Coast Royal » 01 Feb 2026 11:25
by South Coast Royal » 09 Feb 2026 15:26
by Sutekh » 09 Feb 2026 16:30
First, their main problem is simply a case of persisting with a manager who should have been shown the door 4 months ago.South Coast Royal wrote:Liverpool were leading 1-0 when Slot brough Curtis Jones on.
This season they have been subject to what they have previously done themselves to others -goals in added time or late on in games.
It must be a case of concentration.
BTW quite an entertaining game, City more threatening in the first and Liverpool in the second.
Sky commentator and Neville ecstatic over City's comeback because they reckon "we now have a Championship contest".
I'm not too sure about that but it would make Arsenal's away fixture at the Etihad in April interesting if City manage to close the gap.
As for Liverpool they have now played both Arsenal and City away so now need to get cracking again in the League, the FA Cup and Champs League and stop being the slow starters to games, a fault that they share with Reading.
by Franchise FC » 09 Feb 2026 17:45
The trouble with this situation is that Szoboszlai appealed for the foul on him by Haaland - which it clearly wasSutekh wrote:First, their main problem is simply a case of persisting with a manager who should have been shown the door 4 months ago.South Coast Royal wrote:Liverpool were leading 1-0 when Slot brough Curtis Jones on.
This season they have been subject to what they have previously done themselves to others -goals in added time or late on in games.
It must be a case of concentration.
BTW quite an entertaining game, City more threatening in the first and Liverpool in the second.
Sky commentator and Neville ecstatic over City's comeback because they reckon "we now have a Championship contest".
I'm not too sure about that but it would make Arsenal's away fixture at the Etihad in April interesting if City manage to close the gap.
As for Liverpool they have now played both Arsenal and City away so now need to get cracking again in the League, the FA Cup and Champs League and stop being the slow starters to games, a fault that they share with Reading.
Second, yesterday demonstrated exactly why VAR should not be used. Utterly spoiled the spirit of the game and completely ******* stupid that Sboszlai gets sent off for denying a goalscoring opportunity as the ball was clearly rolling straight into an empty net.![]()
But then the standard of refereeing throughout the PL and FL is utterly abysmal so it’s no real surprise.
by Sutekh » 09 Feb 2026 18:07
Yes, I see the logic but I can’t help but feel it ruins the sport to be so anal about these things, the ball was clearly going in whether Haaland touched it or not so I’d have let the goal stand and just ignored the 6 of one and half dozen from the other player antics.Franchise FC wrote:The trouble with this situation is that Szoboszlai appealed for the foul on him by Haaland - which it clearly wasSutekh wrote:First, their main problem is simply a case of persisting with a manager who should have been shown the door 4 months ago.South Coast Royal wrote:Liverpool were leading 1-0 when Slot brough Curtis Jones on.
This season they have been subject to what they have previously done themselves to others -goals in added time or late on in games.
It must be a case of concentration.
BTW quite an entertaining game, City more threatening in the first and Liverpool in the second.
Sky commentator and Neville ecstatic over City's comeback because they reckon "we now have a Championship contest".
I'm not too sure about that but it would make Arsenal's away fixture at the Etihad in April interesting if City manage to close the gap.
As for Liverpool they have now played both Arsenal and City away so now need to get cracking again in the League, the FA Cup and Champs League and stop being the slow starters to games, a fault that they share with Reading.
Second, yesterday demonstrated exactly why VAR should not be used. Utterly spoiled the spirit of the game and completely ******* stupid that Sboszlai gets sent off for denying a goalscoring opportunity as the ball was clearly rolling straight into an empty net.![]()
But then the standard of refereeing throughout the PL and FL is utterly abysmal so it’s no real surprise.
That meant that the goal couldn't be given because without Haaland's foul he would have cleared the ball
Once the goal couldn't be given the rest is straightforward as if Haaland gets in front of Szoboszlai he taps the ball into the empty net
Ironically, had Szoboszlai not appealed for the foul the goal would (probably) have been given and no red card, so he managed to appeal himself into a red card and a ban
If you look through my history you'll see that I've never been a fan of VAR, but I can't see that the refereeing team had any option in the circumstances.
I can imagine Slot going ballistic about the referee (again) if the goal had been allowed with Szoboszlai complaining bitterly about the (second) foul
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 170 guests